bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 29 '19 at 05:23
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.5% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 157
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 556
50% 425 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 26.8
17% 22.8 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 26
Splatting 19
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 553 443 461 575 571 582 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 160 156 161 158 159 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 69%
Lacie Rugged Mini USB3 1TB
90GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 60 60 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 37
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 59.4
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 64 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.7
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback