Sony VPCEE31FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony VPCEE31FX  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '19 at 04:49
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P320-$20
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 63.3
32% 49.3 Pts
4-Core 62.2
8-Core 63.5
8% 62.8 Pts
64-Core 62.3
4% 62.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Sony(104D 9077) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.44
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.69 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MMCRE28G5MXP-0VB 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 132 143 149 141 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 105%
Asmt 2115 250GB
191GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 9.9 11 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 27.1
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 10.3
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 5.1
849% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 39%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 360GB
335GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 27.7
Mixed 28
SusWrite 10.3
18% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 6.2
1,039% 6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA TransMemory-Ex 32GB
18GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 8 8.8 9.4 8.6 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Read 25.6
Write 24.2
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 8.7
26% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
82% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCEE31FX Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCEE31FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback