Biostar TPOWER X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar TPOWER X79  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 01:21
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3820-$380
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.9% Average
SC Int 94.4
SC Float 91.4
SC Mixed 88.3
73% 91.4 Pts
QC Int 260
QC Float 276
QC Mixed 200
56% 245 Pts
MC Int 410
MC Float 448
MC Mixed 478
67% 445 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$1,096
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 309
Reflection 298
Parallax 321
97% 309 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 290
Splatting 184
96% 220 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 112%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 88 91 93 90 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 131
Write 107
Mixed 141
SusWrite 89.7
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 17.4
65% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 116
92% 129 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 80%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$90
220GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 932 595 317 318 318 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,262
Write 1,158
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 466
219% 976 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 50.3
169% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 495
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 463
338% 442 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 151%
Great: 273%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$68
930GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 203 208 212 210 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 157
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 206
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
374% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$7
9GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 94
Write 40.5
Mixed 22
SusWrite 13.6
46% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.7
152% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/ F3-2400C10-4G F3-2400C10-4G 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 21.1
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TPOWER X79 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar TPOWER X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $829
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $366Nvidia GTX 1070 $379Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $159Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $115Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $711SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $100SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback