Biostar TPOWER X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar TPOWER X79  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 01:21
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3820-$390
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37.9% Below average
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 150
58% 119 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 430
38% 315 Pts
64-Core 478
32% 478 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$1,096
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 309
Reflection 298
Parallax 321
97% 309 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 290
Splatting 184
96% 220 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 112%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 88 91 93 90 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 131
Write 107
Mixed 141
SusWrite 89.7
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 17.4
65% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 116
92% 129 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 78%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$90
220GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 932 595 317 318 318 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,262
Write 1,158
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 466
219% 976 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 50.3
169% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 495
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 463
338% 442 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 151%
Great: 275%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$65
930GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 203 208 212 210 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 157
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 206
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
374% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$6
9GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 94
Write 40.5
Mixed 22
SusWrite 13.6
46% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.7
152% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/ F3-2400C10-4G F3-2400C10-4G 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 21.1
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TPOWER X79 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Biostar TPOWER X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $860
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback