Asus P8H67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 13:02
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 177
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 338
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
843GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 77 87 89 96 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 79.1
Write 80.5
Mixed 64
SusWrite 87.8
58% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 59%
Maxtor 6V320F0 320GB
8GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 41 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 34.2
Write 47.4
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 40
28% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.2
133% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 38%
WD Blue 400GB (2008)
116GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 52 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 63.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 52.9
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 45%
WD 2500BMV External 250GB
165GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 21.9
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 23.3
30% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-034.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $430
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback