Asus P5B

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5B (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '17 at 09:56
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3360 631 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Memory 84.1 1-Core 48.7 2-Core 87.5 49% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 193 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Lighting 64.2 Reflection 69.6 Parallax 62.6 52% 65.5 fps	MRender 75.2 Gravity 62 Splatting 55.4 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460 120GB-$200 1,011 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4364 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1785 (AB) Unknown 80 80 40367184 (AE) Unknown 100 100 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 163 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 95 95 95 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3731 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6114 (F9) Unknown 100 100 268900859	65.7% Good	Read 264 Write 257 Mixed 260 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 25.9 102% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 87 93% 155 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 100%
Maxtor 6V320F0 320GB 601 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 72GB free Firmware: VA111900 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 188 187 13779 (04) Start/Stop count 250 250 7554 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 251 237 60924 (09) Power-on hours count 199 199 18762 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 237 237 6493 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 52 454361115 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 253 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 1143 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D2) Unknown 253 252 0 (D3) Unknown 253 252 0 (D4) Unknown 253 252 0	21.4% Poor	Read 36.4 Write 36.8 Mixed 36.2 28% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 3.77 4K Mixed 0.52 152% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 38%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 24GB free Firmware: 10.01E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 159 2225 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2249 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 32 32 49694 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2249 (BE) vendor-specific 76 54 24 (C2) HDA temperature 119 97 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	31.2% Below average	Read 53.6 Write 54.8 Mixed 53.9 41% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.35 86% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 7.1 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5B Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5B - $70

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	27x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	19x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	14x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	10x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	8x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	103x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	28x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16