TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell MXG071

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell MXG071  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 25 '15 at 18:03
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9000
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 100
34% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 97.6
8-Core 99.6
13% 98.6 Pts
64-Core 96.7
6% 96.7 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8700M GT
Dell(1028 019C) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.2702
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 0.81
2% 2.58 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 3.48
3% 3.48 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 2.18%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OS 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 303
Write 150
Mixed 196
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 9.13
62% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 35.8
DQ Mixed 10.3
13% 22 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 40.4%
 Great: 56%
WDC WD75 00BPKT-22PK4T0 750GB
293GB free, PID 2571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.6% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 25.3
Mixed 27
35% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.26
73% 0.88 MB/s
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MXG071 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Dell MXG071

CPU
Core2 Extreme X9000IntelBench 40%, 347 samples4x
Core2 Duo T9300Intel  $70Bench 38%, 3,287 samples3x
Core2 Duo T7500Intel  $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples2x
GPU
GeForce 9800M GTXNvidiaBench 6%, 100 samples4x
GeForce 8700M GTNvidiaBench 2%, 317 samples4x
GeForce 8800M GTXNvidiaBench 5%, 138 samples3x
SSD
850 Pro 256GBSamsung  $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples2x
M4 128GBCrucial  $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples1x
RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples8x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples2x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback