| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Gigabyte A320M-S2H |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180808 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 12 '19 at 18:45 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76%
Very good
|
72% 129 Pts
|
66% 533 Pts
|
52% 840 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 550-$79
Asus(1043 0511) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1
|
17%
Very poor
|
14% 23.4 fps
|
22% 26.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 294 279 257 236 224 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
92% 411 MB/s
|
176% 60.4 MB/s
|
271% 361 MB/s
|
|
USB DISK 3.0 Pro 253GB
98GB free, PID 6023
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 291 291 292 289 292 MB/s
|
97.7%
Outstanding
|
286% 209 MB/s
|
78% 1.6 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 110 110 109 MB/s
|
46.3%
Average
|
126% 94.6 MB/s
|
97% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
89% 31.3 GB/s
|
74% 26 GB/s
|
44% 90 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,645 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 816x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 783x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 746x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 772x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 447x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 413x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $423 |