Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 05:19
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6900K-$399
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
1-Core 108
2-Core 218
76% 163 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 740
74% 584 Pts
64-Core 1,007
68% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$369
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Lighting 293
Reflection 293
Parallax 296
77% 294 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 282
Splatting 230
77% 238 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1793 1791 1607 1437 1275 831 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1881
Write 1,839
Mixed 1,476
SusWrite 1,456
374% 1,663 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 44.1
141% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 259
190% 251 MB/s
Poor: 240%
This bench: 219%
Great: 377%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$449
151GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 448 446 439 441 407 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 449
Mixed 379
SusWrite 438
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 32.7
108% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 248
186% 249 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 126%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$350
429GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1440 1431 1368 1027 931 901 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,673
Write 1,432
Mixed 746
SusWrite 1,183
282% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 37.6
126% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 273
201% 264 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 190%
Great: 282%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$300
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 115 115 116 112 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 165
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 116
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
328% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 22.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 123%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $1,411
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback