Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-D2V  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 06:41
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 59.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 201
67% 122 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 374
52% 385 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 19.8
19% 19.5 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 20.1
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$55
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CV26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 78 85 92 96 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 66.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 90.6
55% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
144GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 71 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 71.7
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54%
Great: 82%
Generic Storage Device 16GB
15GB free, PID 1336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 19 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 16.7
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 18.7
24% 18 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.9
258% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 17%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
293GB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 161 144 150 153 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 143
Write 100
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 150
146% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-014.A00LF 9905584-003.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-D2V Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback