Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '19 at 04:31
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 173
57% 105 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 394
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB
Nvidia(10DE 118F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1328 MHz, MLim: 357 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 412.16
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.5% Very good
Lighting 105
Reflection 93
Parallax 129
85% 109 fps
MRender 88.5
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 106
56% 64.8 fps
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 100%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 107GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 48 46 48 48 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.8% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 20.7
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 226%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback