Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '19 at 05:24
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 940
86% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,328
82% 1,328 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1576 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 82
Parallax 101
64% 87.1 fps
MRender 75.9
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 63.7
59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 479GB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 470 545 557 596 598 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 750
Write 576
Mixed 386
SusWrite 516
125% 557 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 22.1
108% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 543
DQ Mixed 216
209% 317 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
413GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 458 458 457 462 462 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 455
Mixed 404
SusWrite 459
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 34.8
116% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 183
137% 182 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 97%
Amd-raid Hitachi HDS72101 1TB
46GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 61 68 70 69 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 56
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 64.1
37% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 74%
Amd-raid ST95005620AS 500GB
85GB free
Firmware: SD26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 66 71 70 72 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 22
Write 73
Mixed 39
SusWrite 65.9
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 61%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72303 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 22 24 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 125
Write 23.8
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 22.6
38% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 68%
hp v150w 16GB
15GB free, PID 2d40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 12 11 10 11 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 34
Write 29.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 12.7
35% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.6
106% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C17-8GIS F4-3000C16-8GISB F4-2400C17-8GIS F4-3000C16-8GISB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 25.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 24
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 7,618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback