Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 91.6 2-Core 139 67% 107 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 229 30% 227 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4303 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.69% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.59 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 3.39 2% 2.64 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.69% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 773GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC38 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 59.9 Mixed 43.7 40% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 162% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905474-052.A00LF 99P5474-004.A00LF 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.4% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	37x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	12x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $435

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16