EVGA 134-KS-E377

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 134-KS-E377  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 00:19
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 159
2-Core 314
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 1,001
99% 807 Pts
64-Core 1138
70% 1138 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 141
Parallax 129
107% 134 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 136
Splatting 114
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,137
Write 1,248
Mixed 797
306% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 59.3
263% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,166
DQ Write 1,211
DQ Mixed 667
646% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
136GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 141 143 142 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 166
Write 134
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 142
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C16 Series 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 134-KS-E377 Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: EVGA 134-KS-E377

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback