Asus P8Z68-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z68-V (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121109
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '19 at 08:43
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	57%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 210 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 404 44% 351 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Zotac(19DA 2438) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2197 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Lighting 68.1 Reflection 73 Parallax 62.9 56% 68 fps	MRender 77.1 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 71.3 60% 73 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 456 Write 364 Mixed 9.5 60% 277 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 40% 9.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 96GB free Firmware: SS16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 89 88 87 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 90.5 Write 86.7 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 87.4 58% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.9 5.9 4.6 6.4 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	5.93% Terrible	Read 24 Write 9.7 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 5.3 11% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.8 43% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.93% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT25664BA1339.C8F1 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 859B CT25664BA1339.C8F1 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.1% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 11.4 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 91.2 44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z68-V Builds (Compare 822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V - $390

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	247x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	241x
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	45x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	28x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	24x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16