Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '19 at 17:58
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 124
2-Core 243
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 782
77% 631 Pts
64-Core 1,287
80% 1,287 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 383 388 377 383 388 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 381
Mixed 240
SusWrite 384
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 48.6
166% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 266
207% 284 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
44GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 217 233 283 179 212 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 447
Mixed 341
SusWrite 249
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 49.8
173% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 242
211% 315 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 105%
Great: 117%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
53GB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 297 286 286 283 289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 466
Mixed 407
SusWrite 289
545% 409 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 35.5
2,928% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 56.3
DQ Mixed 39.1
3,365% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 284%
Great: 379%
SABRENT 128GB
98GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 241 249 249 242 246 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 389
Write 278
Mixed 226
SusWrite 245
366% 285 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 20.2
2,055% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 44.6
DQ Mixed 21.4
2,317% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 232%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 30.9
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 28.4
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $677
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback