Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	5.85% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	. . (all builds)
Motherboard	http://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 Pro(Intel P35-ICH9R)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080925
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '19 at 16:51
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Memory 28.7 1-Core 8.9 2-Core 32.9 15% 23.5 Pts	4-Core 33.3 8-Core 47 5% 40.2 Pts	64-Core 51.4 3% 51.4 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% XFX(1682 3232) 1GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.48% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 0.23 Parallax 9.25 1% 3.54 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 14.5 Splatting 2.74 6% 7.16 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 2.48% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 9.1 7.9 8.7 10 9.5 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	5.85% Terrible	Read 67.7 Write 48.1 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 10.9 9% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.5 8% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 5.85% Great: 73%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 43GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 6.6 9 9.9 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.61% Terrible	Read 9.7 Write 14 Mixed 13.4 SusWrite 9.3 9% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.1 58% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 5.61% Great: 60%
WD WD5000AAKB-00H8A0 500GB 1,191 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 220GB free Firmware: 05.04E05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.9 6.8 7.5 8.8 8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	4.34% Terrible	Read 7.4 Write 7.8 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 7.7 6% 8.15 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.34% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 1.3 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 262 15% 262 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	13x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	10x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	7x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x
GTX 460 SENvidiaBench 10%, 3,122 samples	4x

SSD
Burst Elite 120GBPatriotBench 67%, 1,599 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16