Asus P5N-D

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5N-D (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '19 at 09:39
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 36.1 2-Core 65.2 38% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 63.2 8-Core 61.4 8% 62.3 Pts	64-Core 64.7 4% 64.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84E3) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 11.5 16% 15.7 fps	MRender 23.4 Gravity 20.9 Splatting 16 16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SS DSC2BB120G4 120GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: D201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 57 56 59 59 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.6% Poor	Read 112 Write 59.8 Mixed 86.3 SusWrite 52.8 17% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 16 60% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 60.5 DQ Write 48.1 DQ Mixed 26.2 27% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 52GB free Firmware: 12.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 62 70 67 71 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 66.3 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 68 47% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 191GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 87 106 101 109 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 107 Write 108 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 102 68% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 70%
WD My Book 1140 4TB 1,831 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 178GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 20 20 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 32 Mixed 30 SusWrite 19.6 38% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 50%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 4,473 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 156GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 20 19 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 28.3 Mixed 24 SusWrite 19.4 34% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-D

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	20x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	18x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	7x
GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples	7x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	5x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	55x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16