ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F7
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150727
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '19 at 23:22
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 38.2 2-Core 74.5 37% 57 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 134 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F846) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 180 102 90 92 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 423 Write 368 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 138 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 28 94% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 169 146% 214 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 799GB free Firmware: AX1P4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 105 105 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 105 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 105 63% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 62%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 6,502 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 222GB free Firmware: 1306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 105 107 107 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 79.3 Write 50.3 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 106 52% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GB 333 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical SATELLITE C55D-C Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C

CPU
A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 31%, 28,018 samples	14x
A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 34%, 2,180 samples	8x
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 2,254 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	14x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	8x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	5x

SSD
MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GBSamsungBench 69%, 476 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
THNSNJ128GVNU 128GBToshibaBench 75%, 310 samples	2x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	5x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback