Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T7400 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0RW199
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120430
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '19 at 06:13
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420 603 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 35.7 2-Core 70.7 36% 55.4 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 275 25% 208 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1700 2,013 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 049A) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
As201 120GB 120GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFC61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 191 62 61 62 61 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.1% Above average	Read 257 Write 209 Mixed 210 SusWrite 110 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 25.7 100% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 115 90% 123 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 84%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 90GB free Firmware: SBM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 49 50 57 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 58.3 Write 58 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 51.4 36% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0 82% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 71%
Hitachi HUA72202 2TB 449 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 23GB free Firmware: A3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 91 85 85 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 77.3 Write 83.5 Mixed 52 SusWrite 87.9 55% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 71%
Hitachi HUA72202 2TB 449 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 503GB free Firmware: A3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 87 90 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	50% Average	Read 84.8 Write 86.8 Mixed 51 SusWrite 89.2 57% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 71%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 306GB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 79 81 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 77.3 Write 83.3 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 79.9 53% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 68%
Hitachi HUS726040ALS214 4TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 451GB free Firmware: MS00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 38 38 38 40 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 36.3 Write 24.5 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 38.1 21% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 65%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$29 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 35GB free Firmware: 2M22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 44 43 44 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 45.5 Write 45.3 Mixed 36 SusWrite 43.4 32% 42.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.8 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3.8 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54721stBench 48%, 256 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54401stBench 46%, 452 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	49x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	18x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16