Intel W2600CR

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Intel W2600CR (all builds)
Memory	250.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20180824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '19 at 17:37
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0 1,646 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 189 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 640 60% 500 Pts	64-Core 1,778 110% 1,778 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 119 Parallax 111 91% 114 fps	MRender 98.6 Gravity 104 Splatting 104 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 392GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1217 1104 814 812 814 814 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 1352 Write 1145 Mixed 1,136 SusWrite 929 256% 1,140 MB/s	4K Read 53.9 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 72.8 262% 97.1 MB/s	DQ Read 850 DQ Write 682 DQ Mixed 756 569% 763 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 4TB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 378 449 449 415 460 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 483 Mixed 464 SusWrite 433 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 54.6 177% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 164 125% 171 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%
Samsung 860 2TB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 449 468 461 461 462 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 451 Mixed 447 SusWrite 461 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 44.4 142% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 152 123% 176 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 119%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 589GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 487 487 465 466 466 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 466 Mixed 437 SusWrite 473 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 49.7 168% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 171 146% 219 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 132%
Samsung 860 2TB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 479 478 466 467 467 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 462 Mixed 444 SusWrite 469 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 43.9 143% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 163 124% 170 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 119%
SST TS231UC-1 4TB 1.5TB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 138 143 141 141 140 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.6% Above average	Read 160 Write 164 Mixed 29 SusWrite 138 160% 123 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 50% 3.17 MB/s

TOSHIBA TransMemory 64GB 812 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 54GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	4.84% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 6 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 4 8% 7.02 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 35% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.84% Great: 30%
SST TS231UC-2 2TB 914GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 138 142 141 141 141 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.5% Very good	Read 166 Write 117 Mixed 41.7 SusWrite 138 147% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.5 244% 2.6 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 16x16GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 16 of 16 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 35 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical W2600CR Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Intel W2600CR

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 01stBench 62%, 884 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	6x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	4x
RX Vega-64AMD $400Bench 87%, 91,676 samples	2x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	5x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	3x
SSDSC2BA400G3 400GBIntelBench 87%, 389 samples	2x

RAM
36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 16x16GBMicronBench 96%, 54 samples	9x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 16x8GBSamsungBench 94%, 85 samples	3x
M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 32GBSamsungBench 44%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 159% - Outstanding

Total price: $302

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16