Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 05:07
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 124
58% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 317
33% 263 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 550
Asus(1043 0513) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 21.1
14% 22.7 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 33.7
22% 26 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 254GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 36 34 40 44 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 320
Write 99.7
Mixed 186
SusWrite 43.2
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 21.1
80% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 152
108% 139 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 126%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
632GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 135 144 141 148 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 148
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 144
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 107%
Ccboot iSCSI 107GB
57GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 65.5
Write 49.2
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 25.1
37% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 5
818% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 55%
Ccboot iSCSI 9TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.9% Poor
Read 66
Write 49.2
Mixed 58
SusWrite 25.1
37% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 4.4
753% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 27%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60
3TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 158 159 162 159 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 144
Write 112
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 158
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 75 69 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 44.7
Write 41
Mixed 45
SusWrite 67
37% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.4
130% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $490
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback