Asus F2A55-M LK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive13.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M LK  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '16 at 18:00
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 132
62% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 242
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
MSI(1462 2441) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 16.2
16% 16.7 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 19.1
13% 14.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V Series 64GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B090 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 109
Write 35.4
Mixed 52
14% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 1.3
25% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 19%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1TB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 126
Write 103
Mixed 105
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.44
102% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 13.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A55-M LK Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M LK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback