Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '18 at 00:09
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 143
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 433
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 24.9
20% 23 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 26
Splatting 19.3
19% 24.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 229 206 214 180 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 465
Write 361
Mixed 327
SusWrite 225
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 36.2
123% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 171
139% 196 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 103%
Kingston SSDNow V Series 64GB
10GB free
Firmware: B090
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 88 87 87 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 118
Write 89
Mixed 90
SusWrite 86.4
22% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.7
30% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Samsung HD400LJ 400GB-$85
307GB free
Firmware: ZZ10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 68
Write 72.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 70.8
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 41%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
692GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 108 107 107 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 112
Write 87.2
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 108
72% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
48GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 67 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 41.8
Write 25.8
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 67.2
30% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 43%
HGST 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1015
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 93 97 96 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 94.7
107% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 50%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
120GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 30
Write 29.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 29.1
38% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.1 6.2 6.6 6.6 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 12.3
Mixed 12
SusWrite 6.4
16% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.8
101% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ Corsair CMX4GX3M2A160 KHX1866C10D3/ Corsair CMX4GX3M2A160 12GB
933, 667, 933, 667 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback