MSI MS-16P5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE63 Raider RGB 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-16P5  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 09:13
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 238
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 774
75% 616 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1214) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 76
Parallax 62.9
55% 68.7 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 72
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 322 259 401 377 335 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 424
Write 92
Mixed 398
SusWrite 338
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 35
108% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 305
230% 308 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 98%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
773GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 31 32 32 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46% Average
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 26
SusWrite 32.3
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 992GB
890GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 30 31 32 31 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 129
Write 122
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 31.5
56% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
928GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 31 32 31 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
46% Average
Read 128
Write 119
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 31.6
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 21.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback