Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 17:36
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 697
74% 590 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Gigabyte(1458 231A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Lighting 74.9
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 112
61% 84.9 fps
MRender 55.2
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 43.7
46% 58.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,650
Write 1,712
Mixed 1281
345% 1,548 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 89.6
304% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 339
336% 543 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 277%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 992GB
666GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 169 167 168 168 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 188
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 166
107% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 27.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 24.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback