Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5700-$22 20,872 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Memory 18.1 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 33.7 14% 22.9 Pts	4-Core 33.5 8-Core 32.6 4% 33 Pts	64-Core 32.5 2% 32.5 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD080HJ 41N3278LEN 80GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZH100-47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 6.3 13 14 34 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 46.6 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 21.9 21% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.7 82% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 32%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB 552 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 250GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 25 27 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 23.2 Write 23.8 Mixed 19.6 SusWrite 27.3 32% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 335 12% 335 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples	52x
Pentium E6500Intel $96Bench 39%, 5,942 samples	35x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	12x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	58x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	19x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	17x

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16