Asrock X299 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X299 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	45 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170704
Uptime	9.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '19 at 21:35
Run Duration	313 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 73.1 1-Core 128 2-Core 254 82% 152 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 924 84% 704 Pts	64-Core 1,284 80% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 118 Parallax 110 94% 115 fps	MRender 97.7 Gravity 102 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230 5,159 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: L2010410 SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 413 427 423 431 442 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 398 Write 468 Mixed 335 SusWrite 427 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 34.2 148% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 314 238% 320 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 948GB free Firmware: 3B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1655 2001 1980 1985 1992 1936 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	352% Outstanding	Read 2,486 Write 1,970 Mixed 1,022 SusWrite 1,925 414% 1,851 MB/s	4K Read 55.3 4K Write 187 4K Mixed 80.9 286% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,164 DQ Write 921 DQ Mixed 806 668% 964 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 352% Great: 363%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 19 20 25 29 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.2% Average	Read 124 Write 102 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 30.2 54% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.1 167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 97%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 430GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 43 45 44 29 50 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 158 Write 153 Mixed 84 SusWrite 38.3 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 56%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 13TB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 8TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 29 26 43 43 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 93.5 Write 100 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 36.5 53% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.2 205% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 17 40 37 40 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 114 Write 125 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 32.5 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 254% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB 1,326 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4.5TB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 211 209 204 203 213 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 198 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 207 124% 170 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.6 193% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 121%
Lexar SD USB_3_0 Read 64GB 189 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 32GB free, PID b049 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 44 0.1 26 64 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 90.7 Write 63 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 43.6 83% 64.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 4.6 309% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76% Very good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 38.8 MC Mixed 25.4 86% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 8.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 Taichi Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	57x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	42x
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	34x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	30x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	17x
870 EVO 2TBSamsung $180Bench 113%, 31,076 samples	11x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA256TCK 256GBBench 161%, 2,141 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	49x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $717

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16