Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '19 at 15:51
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 68.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 239 78% 143 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 899 79% 673 Pts	64-Core 1,858 115% 1,858 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 37C8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.4% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 121 Parallax 120 98% 121 fps	MRender 171 Gravity 119 Splatting 99.8 103% 130 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 112%
AMD HD 6870 25,443 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 21FA) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 23 Reflection 16 Parallax 20.1 19% 19.7 fps	MRender 13.4 Gravity 15.9 Splatting 20.3 14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 550 252 249 247 245 245 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 2,421 Write 1,460 Mixed 1,008 SusWrite 298 286% 1,297 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 71 238% 83.5 MB/s	DQ Read 760 DQ Write 595 DQ Mixed 653 495% 669 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 154GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,233 Write 2,921 Mixed 1,457 631% 2870 MB/s	4K Read 55 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 76.8 252% 88 MB/s	DQ Read 800 DQ Write 617 DQ Mixed 693 523% 703 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD WD6400AARS-00Y5B1 640GB 2,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 518GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 99 99 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 104 Write 93 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 99.4 70% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 62%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 880GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 100 100 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 91 Write 94 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 98.5 65% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 115 115 119 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 114 Write 106 Mixed 63 SusWrite 115 73% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 75%
Synology iSCSI Storage 107GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 93GB free Firmware: 3.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 20 21 21 22 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 24.7 Write 28.7 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 21.4 19% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1 214% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 56%
Synology iSCSI Storage 201GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 179GB free Firmware: 3.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 20 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 22.8 Write 34.5 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 20.4 19% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 2 360% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C15 4x16GB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	MC Read 67.8 MC Write 67.8 MC Mixed 66.8 193% 67.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 39.5 SC Mixed 27.3 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 188%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	58x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	35x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	21x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	13x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	7x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3866 C18 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 102%, 1,063 samples	9x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	7x
F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR 64GBUnknownBench 102%, 20 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,030

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16