Asrock H87M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H87M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '16 at 02:57
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$38
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 180
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 257
31% 237 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
ASRock(1849 041E) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3186
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 3.84
3% 4.29 fps
MRender 8.62
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.78
5% 6.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 496
Write 349
Mixed 335
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 21.1
143% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 47.7
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 21.1
29% 52.6 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AQ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 117
Write 135
Mixed 127
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.44
120% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
344GB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 97.7
Mixed 95.6
74% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.19
78% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 107%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
286GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 78.9
Write 75
Mixed 57.5
53% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.15
64% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 63%
USB Disk 32GB
19GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 201
Write 42.9
Mixed 60.6
100% 102 MB/s
4K Read 6.89
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.31
46% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 21
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M Pro4 - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $405
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback