Asus PRIME Z270-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-K  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 07 '19 at 21:31
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 293
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 552
74% 551 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 189
Parallax 171
137% 176 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 171
Splatting 123
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 867 639 649 634 651 655 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,847
Write 1639
Mixed 686
SusWrite 683
270% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 62.7
245% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 1,425
DQ Mixed 1,051
851% 1,190 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 246%
Great: 254%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$108
459GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 464 475 456 484 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 491
Mixed 420
SusWrite 470
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 52.7
190% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 124%
Great: 121%
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82
110GB free
Firmware: SB4OC70P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 39.3
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 41.4
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 25%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
854GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 91 86 82 87 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 130
Write 114
Mixed 38
SusWrite 86.4
67% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 101%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
29GB free, PID 0732
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 7.7 11 11 9.2 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
Read 12.3
Write 7.3
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 9.1
14% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
70% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 40%
JMicron 250GB
214GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.7
Write 42.5
Mixed 51
67% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 Adata DDR4 2800 2OZ CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 Adata DDR4 2800 2OZ 16GB
2473, 2473, 2473, 2473 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 28
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 26.7
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-K Builds (Compare 2,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-K - $74

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $644
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback