To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 25.2
2-Core 49.2
35% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 49.1
8-Core 49.4
7% 49.2 Pts
64-Core 49.6
3% 49.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6Y160L0 164GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YAR41BW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 25 17 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 25.1
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 27.4
20% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 32%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
120GB free
Firmware: JF100-15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 66 67 67 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 68.3
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 65.5
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
12% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 0
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback