Asus M2N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080327
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '19 at 09:22
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 63
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 70.1
37% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 66.2
8-Core 66.6
9% 66.4 Pts
64-Core 69.6
4% 69.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5830
Sapphire(174B E177) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 16.9
15% 15.8 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 14
Splatting 14.1
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SVP200S37A1 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 65 72 61 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 88
Write 80.5
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 66.6
18% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 21.1
72% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 62.3
DQ Mixed 30.6
27% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 41%
Maxtor 6Y160L0 164GB
150GB free
Firmware: YAR41BW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 50.7
Mixed 41
SusWrite 55.3
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback