Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5667 365 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 76.7 2-Core 165 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 432 48% 378 Pts	64-Core 733 45% 733 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% MSI(1462 3110) 2GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Lighting 13.9 Reflection 13.1 Parallax 10.1 11% 12.4 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 14.3 11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD0256XQC82X200M34237 256GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5FAM018 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 104 113 120 132 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 111 Write 165 Mixed 117 SusWrite 112 29% 126 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 3.9 28% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 65.2 DQ Write 17.5 DQ Mixed 0.3 11% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 12 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.6% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7.3 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16