Asus StrikerExtreme

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus StrikerExtreme  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100301
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 18 '19 at 05:23
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 76.3
42% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 151
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.9% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 81.3
31% 62.1 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 56.6
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd0163abyx-23 39M4507 42C0462IBM 160GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware:
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 109 114 114 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 125
Write 125
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 107
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
81GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 22 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 102
Write 23
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 22.6
35% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3402111A 40GB
11GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 47 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 48.3
Write 9.8
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 47.7
23% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 4.1
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.3
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical StrikerExtreme Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus StrikerExtreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $57
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback