Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '19 at 22:36
Run Duration478 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$177
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 266
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 833
84% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 3052 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 153
Parallax 133
116% 143 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 164
Splatting 115
107% 132 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1131 1120 1131 1037 1050 1005 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,480
Write 2,201
Mixed 1,623
SusWrite 1079
413% 1,846 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 85.8
283% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 1,123
DQ Mixed 1158
878% 1,181 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 306%
Great: 372%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$197
590GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1381 1205 1209 1200 1203 1198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,039
Write 1,674
Mixed 774
SusWrite 1,233
319% 1,430 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 66.2
234% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1374
DQ Write 1,178
DQ Mixed 1,120
882% 1224 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 286%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 1TB
508GB free
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 478 480 477 481 478 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 500
Write 487
Mixed 447
SusWrite 479
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 60.9
196% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 1TB
259GB free
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 391 391 393 390 390 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 363
Write 364
Mixed 346
SusWrite 391
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 54.7
183% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 251
182% 236 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 391 391 393 390 390 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 352
Write 374
Mixed 351
SusWrite 391
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 55.8
174% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 253
184% 238 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
Intel Optane+9.0TBHDD
2.5TB free
Firmware: 17.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 275 273 273 172 169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 18% Great: 43%
External USB3.0 DISK02 8TB
3TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 82 78 79 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.3% Above average
Read 126
Write 119
Mixed 109
SusWrite 78.8
144% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.7
212% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 54%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 81 78 78 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 86.5
Write 145
Mixed 134
SusWrite 78.4
158% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK04 8TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 103 94 95 95 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.6% Below average
Read 81.2
Write 157
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 95.7
130% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
48% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 75 74 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 73.3
Write 67.8
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 74.5
98% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.5
198% 2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB
3TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 110 118 122 122 131 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 126
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 122
132% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.3
212% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59%
Great: 74%
External USB3.0 DISK03 8TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 111 119 123 123 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.1% Below average
Read 49
Write 160
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 122
139% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
47% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 73%
External USB3.0 DISK03 10TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 55 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
45% Average
Read 123
Write 137
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 52.7
130% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45%
Great: 92%
External USB3.0 DISK02 10TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 55 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 144
Write 151
Mixed 67
SusWrite 52.7
132% 104 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.9
210% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 89%
External USB3.0 DISK04 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 55 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 136
Write 138
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 52.6
138% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.3
224% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 74%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 146 164 162 160 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 120
Write 144
Mixed 105
SusWrite 157
184% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
203% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-16GTZR 04CD F4-3000C14-16GTZR 04CD F4-3000C16-16GTZR 04CD F4-3000C14-16GTZR 64GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 26.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,086
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback