Asus PRIME Z690-P D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-P D4  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 02:58
Run Duration406 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$160
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 76.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 909
80% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,262
78% 1,262 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 135
Parallax 238
94% 163 fps
MRender 218
Gravity 123
Splatting 187
144% 176 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2310 2117 2251 1951 1504 1511 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2610
Write 2358
Mixed 1,955
SusWrite 1,940
498% 2,216 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 97.5
326% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,117
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 975
736% 992 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 369%
Great: 438%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1790 1964 1972 1601 257 234 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,621
Write 2,118
Mixed 1,692
SusWrite 1,303
380% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 73.2
240% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1209
DQ Write 951
DQ Mixed 1,056
797% 1072 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 267%
Great: 321%
WD My Passport 0740 750GB
661GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 84 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 86.5
Write 85.6
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 84.8
103% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36%
Great: 35%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 149 149 146 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.5% Very good
Read 185
Write 191
Mixed 128
SusWrite 148
219% 163 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.9
239% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 74%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB
6TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 149 149 146 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 123
Write 132
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 148
168% 122 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.8
239% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK02 8TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.2% Below average
Read 131
Write 153
Mixed 114
SusWrite 0.1
129% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
186% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 54%
External USB3.0 DISK03 8TB
7TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 183 180 182 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
Read 142
Write 166
Mixed 127
SusWrite 179
213% 154 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
External USB3.0 DISK04 8TB
7.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 183 180 182 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.8% Very good
Read 173
Write 171
Mixed 97.9
SusWrite 179
209% 155 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.5
165% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK00 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 121
Write 127
Mixed 86
141% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.8
366% 3.8 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 0.8
386% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 51%
External USB3.0 DISK01 5TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 109
Write 143
Mixed 86
SusWrite 0
110% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 0.9
373% 3.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 1
389% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK02 750GB
600GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 104 105 104 105 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 99.4
135% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%
External USB3.0 DISK03 320GB
285GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 104 105 104 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 101
Write 95.1
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 99.5
113% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 31.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 24.1
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 75 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical PRIME Z690-P D4 Builds (Compare 9,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P D4 - $306

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,121
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback