Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R940  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3358-A1
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5760 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 163
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 603
54% 455 Pts
64-Core 2,012
124% 2,012 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
240GB free
Firmware: 3L2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 539 514 545 551 586 574 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,474
Write 524
Mixed 851
SusWrite 551
188% 850 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 55.4
190% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 464
354% 485 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 174%
Great: 296%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
593GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 112 116 130 119 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69% Good
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 123
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
92GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 116 118 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 174
Write 133
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 122
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 112%
Generic Flash HS-COMBO 4GB
2GB free, PID 2228
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.8 3.8 4.1 4 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Read 6
Write 4
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4
6% 4.82 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 12
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 12.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback