Lenovo 90FB0001US

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 90FB0001US (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO SKYBAY
Memory	17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160606
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 24 '19 at 18:50
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 23 1-Core 91 2-Core 182 49% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 265 38% 281 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1642 3E56) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.43% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 6.92 Parallax 7.88 5% 7.09 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 0.09 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.43% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 187 158 48 80 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 421 Write 387 Mixed 252 SusWrite 126 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 30.6 108% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 158 160% 260 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 101%
Seagate ST1000DX001-SSHD-8GB 1TB 7,180 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2GB free Firmware: CC61 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 51.7 Write 68.7 Mixed 46 41% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 2.3 394% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 114%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB 3,961 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 577GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 104 103 82 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 97.2 Write 94.5 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 96.7 128% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 71%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -0 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID 0301 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.4 10 10 10 9.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 63.7 Write 19 Mixed 9 SusWrite 9.8 26% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 24% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 17%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 7.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 99 103 108 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 105 Write 96.7 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 102 122% 91.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 86%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -2 32GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 22GB free, PID 0301 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.2 9.9 9.8 10 9.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 61.8 Write 9.7 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 9.6 23% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.5 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 31%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 469 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 140GB free, PID 0577 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 38 37 37 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 37.6 Write 34.6 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 36.2 48% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 334 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 387GB free, PID 0577 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 42 41 41 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 37.4 Write 24.7 Mixed 31 SusWrite 40.2 45% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 0215 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 0118 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 0215 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.9% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 23.1 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 20 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 299 13% 299 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90FB0001US Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FB0001US

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	126x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	8x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	69x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	5x
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	4x

RAM
RMUA5090KE68H9F2133 2x4GBRamaxelBench 69%, 469 samples	15x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	13x
M378A5143EB1-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 68%, 4,308 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16