Hp-pavilion FR443AA-ABU m9451uk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion FR443AA-ABU m9451uk  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 20 '16 at 18:39
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 66.7
38% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 121
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Palit(1569 1380) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 17.8
16% 17.9 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 17.9
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandis SP256G 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 255
Write 207
Mixed 202
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 16.2
78% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 98.7
DQ Mixed 42.5
52% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 95%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$45
206GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 130
Mixed 121
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 5.39
4K Mixed 0.56
184% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 108%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
101GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 45.2
Mixed 49
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.31
91% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 46%
Toshib MD04ACA400 4TB
115GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 139
Mixed 104
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2.05
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.24
151% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback