MSI FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131012
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 28 '19 at 17:27
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 70
2-Core 125
57% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 215
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 31
Parallax 32.8
21% 29.8 fps
MRender 30.4
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 34.1
25% 30.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 66 49 52 27 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.1% Above average
Read 231
Write 205
Mixed 194
SusWrite 60.5
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 28.2
100% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 93.4
89% 140 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
5GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 86 82 79 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 83
Write 63.3
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 83
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 54%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
13GB free
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 48 48 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 49.3
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 47.7
34% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
572GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 143 145 143 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 150
Write 114
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 143
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.4
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback