Asus A_F_K20CE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus A_F_K20CE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A_F_K20CE
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime12 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 08:19
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium J3710
BGA 1170, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 25.9
2-Core 50.9
31% 45.1 Pts
4-Core 71.1
8-Core 98.7
11% 84.9 Pts
64-Core 98.1
6% 98.1 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Asus(1043 8670) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.23
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 3.72
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 5.09
4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 153 160 162 160 174 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.3% Below average
Read 157
Write 144
Mixed 118
SusWrite 158
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 9.3
44% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 66.3
58% 87 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 38 94 93 118 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 8.8
Write 38.5
Mixed 13.1
SusWrite 91.2
27% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 109%
USB 2TB
66GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 23 23 39 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 17.5
Write 28.7
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 34.2
15% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_F_K20CE Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus A_F_K20CE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback