Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime12.4 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 11:13
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 517
54% 437 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
HP(103C 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0509
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 172 202 183 109 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 407
Write 253
Mixed 271
SusWrite 167
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 16.1
72% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 82.3
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 32.4
43% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 69%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
91GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 106 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 86
Write 79
Mixed 72
SusWrite 105
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC72C8PG0NF-DI 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W520 POWER Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $706
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback