Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161116
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '19 at 16:04
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 190 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 450 47% 377 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470 5,537 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Gainward(10B0 0401) 1.2GB CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 28.9 Parallax 20.5 15% 22.7 fps	MRender 31.1 Gravity 14.7 Splatting 20.7 18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 128GB-$72 770 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 204 197 191 193 193 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.4% Good	Read 252 Write 222 Mixed 167 SusWrite 197 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 27.1 105% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 113 103% 158 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 90%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 779GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 100 100 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 101 Write 97.7 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 99.5 64% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 11.3 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 7.9 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	379x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	252x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	275x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	176x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	159x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	104x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	71x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	55x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	87x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	59x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $207

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16