Supermicro X9DAX-HFT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DAX-HFT  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAX-HFT
Memory83.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime22.9 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 03:45
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 726
64% 545 Pts
64-Core 2,220
137% 2,220 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
45.8% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 58.3
Parallax 71.3
47% 62.4 fps
MRender 58.1
Gravity 55.8
Splatting 48.5
44% 54.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 81 85 87 90 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 463
Write 149
Mixed 182
SusWrite 90.6
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 28.4
114% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 78
107% 199 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 118%
Mushkin Chronos 240GB-$99
223GB free
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 87 88 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 170
Write 120
Mixed 118
SusWrite 88.8
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 22.7
95% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 82.7
75% 115 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 91%
Adaptec Array 44TB
600GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4 4.2 4 4.1 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
Read 115
Write 5
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 4
24% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
278% 1.83 MB/s
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
241GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 77 76 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 133
Write 101
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 76.2
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 132 132 133 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 115
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 129
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C HMT31GR7AFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C HMT31GR7AFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C HMT31GR7AFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C Sem... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80% Very good
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 28.1
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.1
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DAX-HFT Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

System: Supermicro X9DAX-HFT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $50
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback