Fujitsu CELSIUS M740

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M740  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3348-A1
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150402
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 13:26
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 181
57% 102 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 550
54% 442 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 24
Parallax 34
19% 27 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 26.9
25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512 512GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 147 145 133 124 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 313
Write 209
Mixed 168
SusWrite 136
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 25.8
104% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 245
184% 247 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Extreme SSD 500GB
306GB free, PID 558c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 207 207 207 203 204 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 234
Mixed 203
SusWrite 206
297% 218 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 16.3
1,848% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 25.2
2,748% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 193%
Great: 374%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
796GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 105 105 107 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 104
Write 99.2
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 105
118% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF Micron 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 Micron 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 34.5
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M740 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M740

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback