Asus P8H61-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 15:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 170
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 320
45% 332 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 580
Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.0
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 0.72
2% 2.29 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 3
3% 3.16 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 167 115 85 96 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.4% Above average
Read 257
Write 238
Mixed 237
SusWrite 133
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 24.5
102% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 1
51% 122 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 86%
WD Passport AV 25F5 1TB
931GB free, PID 25f5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 22.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 27.5
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair VS2GB1333D4 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback