Medion MD34647

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion MD34647  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 15:24
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$183
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 594
72% 556 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$226
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.1% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 116
Parallax 120
105% 122 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.6
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT1000P3 1TB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,044
Write 1,955
Mixed 868
290% 1,289 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 6.8
90% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 641
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 168
173% 299 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 451%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
373GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.4
Write 29.6
Mixed 28.1
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.2
Write 136
Mixed 66.8
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD Passport AV 25F5 1TB
929GB free, PID 25f5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 108 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 101
Write 105
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 108
121% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 45%
WD Elements 1TB
496GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.8
Write 59.4
Mixed 41.4
66% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
10GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.1
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.7
13% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 24.5
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 23.4
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 MED461C MD21473
Typical MD34647 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Medion MD34647

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback