Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '19 at 12:52
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	82%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	47.4% Average	Memory 61.2 1-Core 55 2-Core 97.1 44% 71.1 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 274 28% 228 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3418) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.2 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Lighting 68.3 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 86.3 56% 74.3 fps	MRender 68.7 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 55.3 52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB 4,102 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1026E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 325 97 193 98 287 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 1,127 Write 423 Mixed 101 SusWrite 201 100% 463 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 26.6 109% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 709 DQ Write 576 DQ Mixed 78 212% 454 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 191%
Intenso Sata III 256GB 2,573 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 183GB free Firmware: O0617A SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 289 287 294 293 293 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 204 Write 177 Mixed 150 SusWrite 290 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 16.6 55% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 152 131% 193 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 95%
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB 2,727 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 70GB free Firmware: SBFM11.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 93 92 92 92 93 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.5% Average	Read 244 Write 196 Mixed 177 SusWrite 127 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 15.8 66% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 213 177% 251 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 96%
General UDisk0617 4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.9 4.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 4.7 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.6 8% 6.58 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	67.2% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 25.5 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 13.8 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,406x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	540x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	228x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	207x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	245x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	184x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16