Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5405 294 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 28.5 2-Core 57.5 34% 50.1 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 226 20% 170 Pts	64-Core 228 14% 228 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 440GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 367GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7.24 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 323 Mixed 401 91% 413 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 44.5 149% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 50.2 52% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 98%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 440GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 405GB free Firmware: 7.24 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 15.1 Mixed 80.2 34% 43.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.32 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.43 110% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 120%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 6.3 17% 6.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 142%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 349 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	1x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x

SSD
LOGICAL VOLUME 240GBHPBench 59%, 62 samples	1x

RAM
14GBUnknownBench 35%, 9,406 samples	1x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16