HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 21 '19 at 17:17
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$132
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 59.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 170
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 462
52% 407 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
HP(103C 2B4E) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 7.84
5% 7.06 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 7.17
Splatting 7.04
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 39 40 39 40 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
646GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 339 320 331 326 337 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 374
Mixed 350
SusWrite 335
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 38.6
133% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 338
254% 339 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 121%
Seagate SkyHawk 6TB (2016)-$143
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 74 77 73 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 31.8
Write 73.9
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 78.5
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 117 117 113 110 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 100
Write 105
Mixed 68
SusWrite 113
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 65%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
420GB free
Firmware: 4207
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 84 84 85 86 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
47% Average
Read 81
Write 75.9
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 82.8
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47%
Great: 65%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
389GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 34.2
Write 39.8
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 38
27% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.3
138% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 65%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
120GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 59 65 58 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 34.7
Write 68.7
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 59.4
41% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.4
154% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 67%
SMI USB disk 8GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 3.3
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 4.3
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 10%
Generic External 1TB
321GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 80 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 77.4
Write 78.6
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 79.3
88% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 63%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
6GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 27 11 9.7 9.9 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 112
Write 34.1
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 14.9
58% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.2
194% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 32%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
106GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 38 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 36.7
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 36.9
45% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 2,964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $95
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback